You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cross-institutional analysis of the effects of broadening trainee professional development on research productivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000956 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick D. Brandt, Susi Sturzenegger Varvayanis, Tracey Baas, Amanda F. Bolgioni, Janet Alder, Kimberly A. Petrie, Isabel Dominguez, Abigail M. Brown, C. Abigail Stayart, Harinder Singh, Audra Van Wart, Christine S. Chow, Ambika Mathur, Barbara M. Schreiber, David A. Fruman, Brent Bowden, Christopher A. Wiesen, Yvonne M. Golightly, Chris E. Holmquist, Daniel Arneman, Joshua D. Hall, Linda E. Hyman, Kathleen L. Gould, Roger Chalkley, Patrick J. Brennwald, Rebekah L. Layton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 55 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 54% |
| Scientists | 51 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2023.
All research outputs
#244,610
of 24,900,093 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#508
of 8,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,531
of 428,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#15
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,900,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.