↓ Skip to main content

Downscaling of species distribution models: 
a hierarchical approach

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Downscaling of species distribution models: 
a hierarchical approach
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00264.x
Authors

Petr Keil, Jonathan Belmaker, Adam M. Wilson, Philip Unitt, Walter Jetz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 3%
Brazil 8 3%
United States 7 2%
Spain 4 1%
Italy 4 1%
Switzerland 4 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 245 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 107 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 24%
Student > Master 31 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 57 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 163 55%
Environmental Science 85 29%
Unspecified 28 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 9 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,573,112
of 13,216,344 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,152
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,988
of 250,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#16
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,216,344 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.