↓ Skip to main content

Downscaling of species distribution models: a hierarchical approach

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Downscaling of species distribution models: a hierarchical approach
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00264.x
Authors

Petr Keil, Jonathan Belmaker, Adam M. Wilson, Philip Unitt, Walter Jetz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
United States 7 2%
Brazil 6 2%
Italy 4 1%
Switzerland 4 1%
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 327 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 119 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 21%
Student > Master 40 11%
Other 22 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 5%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 30 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 187 50%
Environmental Science 98 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 15 4%
Unknown 48 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,158,001
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#2,070
of 2,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,237
of 289,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.