You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Educational needs of medical practitioners about medical billing: a scoping review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12960-021-00631-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margaret Faux, Jon Adams, Jonathan Wardle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 43% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 31 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 34 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,968,832
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#718
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,177
of 446,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.