↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Use of Renin-Angiotensin System Antagonists and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association Between Use of Renin-Angiotensin System Antagonists and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2012
DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.14785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars H. Lund, Lina Benson, Ulf Dahlström, Magnus Edner

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) may be as common and as lethal as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). Three randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ie, renin-angiotensin system [RAS] antagonists) did not reach primary end points but may have had selection bias or been underpowered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Chile 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 109 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Researcher 17 15%
Other 14 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2012.
All research outputs
#2,760,106
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#14,398
of 36,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,660
of 286,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#93
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.