↓ Skip to main content

How Random Is Social Behaviour? Disentangling Social Complexity through the Study of a Wild House Mouse Population

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Random Is Social Behaviour? Disentangling Social Complexity through the Study of a Wild House Mouse Population
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002786
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Perony, Claudio J. Tessone, Barbara König, Frank Schweitzer

Abstract

Out of all the complex phenomena displayed in the behaviour of animal groups, many are thought to be emergent properties of rather simple decisions at the individual level. Some of these phenomena may also be explained by random processes only. Here we investigate to what extent the interaction dynamics of a population of wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in their natural environment can be explained by a simple stochastic model. We first introduce the notion of perceptual landscape, a novel tool used here to describe the utilisation of space by the mouse colony based on the sampling of individuals in discrete locations. We then implement the behavioural assumptions of the perceptual landscape in a multi-agent simulation to verify their accuracy in the reproduction of observed social patterns. We find that many high-level features--with the exception of territoriality--of our behavioural dataset can be accounted for at the population level through the use of this simplified representation. Our findings underline the potential importance of random factors in the apparent complexity of the mice's social structure. These results resonate in the general context of adaptive behaviour versus elementary environmental interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 3%
United States 3 3%
Portugal 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 90 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 28%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 16 16%
Professor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 43%
Physics and Astronomy 7 7%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,917,584
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,695
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,734
of 286,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#23
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.