You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Variability of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Imaging Biomarkers with Respect to Section Plane Angulation: How Wrong a Radiologist Can Be?
American Journal of Neuroradiology, April 2021
P. Ryska, O. Slezak, A. Eklund, J. Salzer, J. Malm, J. Zizka
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Tanzania, United Republic of||1||3%|
|Members of the public||21||68%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||6||19%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||17%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||8%|
|Student > Master||1||8%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||7||58%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,823,556 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
of 5,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 431,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,823,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.