↓ Skip to main content

Altered Retinoic Acid Metabolism in Diabetic Mouse Kidney Identified by 18O Isotopic Labeling and 2D Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altered Retinoic Acid Metabolism in Diabetic Mouse Kidney Identified by 18O Isotopic Labeling and 2D Mass Spectrometry
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011095
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan M. Starkey, Yingxin Zhao, Rovshan G. Sadygov, Sigmund J. Haidacher, Wanda S. LeJeune, Nilay Dey, Bruce A. Luxon, Maureen A. Kane, Joseph L. Napoli, Larry Denner, Ronald G. Tilton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 43 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Chemistry 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2021.
All research outputs
#18,836,571
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#159,778
of 199,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,281
of 97,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#649
of 702 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 702 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.