↓ Skip to main content

Development of a taxonomy to describe massage treatments for musculoskeletal pain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a taxonomy to describe massage treatments for musculoskeletal pain
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-6-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen J Sherman, Marian W Dixon, Diana Thompson, Daniel C Cherkin

Abstract

One of the challenges in conducting research in the field of massage and bodywork is the lack of consistent terminology for describing the treatments given by massage therapists. The objective of this study was to develop a taxonomy to describe what massage therapists actually do when giving a massage to patients with musculoskeletal pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Italy 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 128 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 45 33%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 16%
Sports and Recreations 21 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 20 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,869,788
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#523
of 3,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,102
of 64,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.