You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of Artificial Intelligence to Improve the Quality Control of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.709347 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ya-qi Song, Xin-li Mao, Xian-bin Zhou, Sai-qin He, Ya-hong Chen, Li-hui Zhang, Shi-wen Xu, Ling-ling Yan, Shen-ping Tang, Li-ping Ye, Shao-wei Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 29% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 16% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,545,930
of 26,018,952 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#751
of 7,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,775
of 448,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#52
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,018,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.