You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prediction of Co-Receptor Usage of HIV-1 from Genotype
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000743 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J. Nikolaj Dybowski, Dominik Heider, Daniel Hoffmann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
Researcher | 11 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 38% |
Computer Science | 11 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,745,608
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,699
of 9,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,534
of 104,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#34
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.