↓ Skip to main content

Take Notes, Not Photos: Mind-Wandering Mediates the Impact of Note-Taking Strategies on Video-Recorded Lecture Learning Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 733)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
110 X users

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Take Notes, Not Photos: Mind-Wandering Mediates the Impact of Note-Taking Strategies on Video-Recorded Lecture Learning Performance
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, March 2023
DOI 10.1037/xap0000375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Shi Hui Wong, Stephen Wee Hun Lim

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Lecturer 3 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Student > Master 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 91 81%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 90 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#343,015
of 26,619,752 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
#25
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,210
of 432,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,619,752 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.