↓ Skip to main content

FADS1 FADS2 Gene Cluster, PUFA Intake and Blood Lipids in Children: Results from the GINIplus and LISAplus Studies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FADS1 FADS2 Gene Cluster, PUFA Intake and Blood Lipids in Children: Results from the GINIplus and LISAplus Studies
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037780
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Standl, Eva Lattka, Barbara Stach, Sibylle Koletzko, Carl-Peter Bauer, Andrea von Berg, Dietrich Berdel, Ursula Krämer, Beate Schaaf, Stefan Röder, Olf Herbarth, Anette Buyken, Tim Drogies, Joachim Thiery, Berthold Koletzko, Joachim Heinrich

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 10 16%
Professor 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#93,048
of 199,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,113
of 164,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,490
of 3,778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.