↓ Skip to main content

Pollution Impacts on Bacterioplankton Diversity in a Tropical Urban Coastal Lagoon System

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pollution Impacts on Bacterioplankton Diversity in a Tropical Urban Coastal Lagoon System
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gigliola R. B. Salloto, Alexander M. Cardoso, Felipe H. Coutinho, Leonardo H. Pinto, Ricardo P. Vieira, Catia Chaia, Joyce L. Lima, Rodolpho M. Albano, Orlando B. Martins, Maysa M. Clementino

Abstract

Despite a great number of published studies addressing estuarine, freshwater and marine bacterial diversity, few have examined urban coastal lagoons in tropical habitats. There is an increasing interest in monitoring opportunistic pathogens as well as indigenous microbial community members in these water bodies by current molecular and microbiological approaches. In this work, bacterial isolates were obtained through selective plate dilution methods to evaluate antibiotic resistances. In addition, 16S rRNA gene libraries were prepared from environmental waters and mixed cultures grown in BHI medium inoculated with Jacarepaguá lagoon waters. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analyses showed distinct community profiles between environmental communities from each studied site and their cultured counterparts. A total of 497 bacterial sequences were analyzed by MOTHUR, yielding 245 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) grouped at 97% similarity. CCA diagrams showcased how several environmental variables affect the distribution of 18 bacterial orders throughout the three distinct habitats. UniFrac metrics and Venn diagrams revealed that bacterial communities retrieved through each experimental approach were significantly different and that only one OTU, closely related to Vibrio cholerae, was shared between them. Potentially pathogenic bacteria were isolated from most sampled environments, fifty percent of which showed antibiotic resistance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 101 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 36%
Environmental Science 17 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,174,175
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,807
of 193,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,324
of 276,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,904
of 4,722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.