The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,432 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corneal confocal microscopy identifies corneal nerve fibre loss and increased dendritic cells in patients with long COVID
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Ophthalmology, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319450 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gulfidan Bitirgen, Celalettin Korkmaz, Adil Zamani, Ahmet Ozkagnici, Nazmi Zengin, Georgios Ponirakis, Rayaz A Malik |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 54 | 4% |
| Australia | 47 | 3% |
| Spain | 41 | 3% |
| France | 18 | 1% |
| Germany | 17 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 1% |
| Mexico | 13 | <1% |
| Canada | 12 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 12 | <1% |
| Other | 97 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1104 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1256 | 88% |
| Scientists | 87 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 68 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 24% |
| Unknown | 43 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 44 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1558. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,756
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#1
of 6,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#359
of 447,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#1
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.