You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do members of the public think they should use lateral flow tests (LFT) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests when they have COVID-19-like symptoms? The COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health (Elsevier), July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.07.023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise E. Smith, Henry WW. Potts, Richard Amlȏt, Nicola T. Fear, Susan Michie, G James Rubin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 35 | 42% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 44 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 61% |
| Scientists | 18 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#901,924
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Public Health (Elsevier)
#132
of 3,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,045
of 442,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health (Elsevier)
#5
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.