You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A day in the life: a qualitative study of clinical decision-making and uptake of neurorehabilitation technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-021-00911-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Courtney Celian, Veronica Swanson, Maahi Shah, Caitlin Newman, Bridget Fowler-King, Sarah Gallik, Kaitlin Reilly, David J. Reinkensmeyer, James Patton, Miriam R. Rafferty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2021.
All research outputs
#14,267,331
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#707
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,082
of 433,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.