You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Roadmap Consensus on Carotid Artery Plaque Imaging and Impact on Therapy Strategies and Guidelines: An International, Multispecialty, Expert Review and Position Statement
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a7223 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
L. Saba, W. Brinjikji, J.D. Spence, M. Wintermark, M. Castillo, G.J. de Borst, Q. Yang, C. Yuan, A. Buckler, M. Edjlali, T. Saam, D. Saloner, B.K. Lal, D. Capodanno, J. Sun, N. Balu, R. Naylor, A.v.d. Lugt, B.A. Wasserman, M.E. Kooi, J. Wardlaw, J. Gillard, G. Lanzino, U. Hedin, D. Mikulis, A. Gupta, J.K. DeMarco, C. Hess, J.V. Goethem, T. Hatsukami, P. Rothwell, M.M. Brown, A.R. Moody |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 36% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Brazil | 2 | 6% |
Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
Peru | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 27% |
Scientists | 5 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,547,717
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#197
of 4,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,001
of 435,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.