You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing Patterns of Human-Wildlife Conflicts and Compensation around a Central Indian Protected Area
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0050433 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krithi K. Karanth, Arjun M. Gopalaswamy, Ruth DeFries, Natasha Ballal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 478 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 96 | 19% |
| Researcher | 94 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 11% |
| Unknown | 99 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 158 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 158 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 39 | 8% |
| Unknown | 113 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,626,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,991
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,574
of 291,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#368
of 4,796 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,796 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.