↓ Skip to main content

Glycans pattern the phase behaviour of lipid membranes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glycans pattern the phase behaviour of lipid membranes
Published in
Nature Materials, November 2012
DOI 10.1038/nmat3492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anand Bala Subramaniam, Guido Guidotti, Vinothan N. Manoharan, Howard A. Stone

Abstract

Hydrated networks of glycans (polysaccharides)--in the form of cell walls, periplasms or gel-like matrices--are ubiquitously present adjacent to cellular plasma membranes. Yet, despite their abundance, the function of glycans in the extracellular milieu is largely unknown. Here we show that the spatial configuration of glycans controls the phase behaviour of multiphase model lipid membranes: inhomogeneous glycan networks stabilize large lipid domains at the characteristic length scale of the network, whereas homogeneous networks suppress macroscopic lipid phase separation. We also find that glycan-patterned phase separation is thermally reversible--thus indicating that the effect is thermodynamic rather than kinetic--and that phase patterning probably results from a preferential interaction of glycans with ordered lipid phases. These findings have implications for membrane-mediated transport processes, potentially rationalize long-standing observations that differentiate the behaviour of native and model membranes and may indicate an intimate coupling between cellular lipidomes and glycomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 97 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 30%
Researcher 19 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 20 19%
Chemistry 19 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 17%
Engineering 17 17%
Materials Science 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#13,677,179
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#3,476
of 3,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,770
of 276,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#43
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.