The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 180 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Climate Change, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3 |
| Authors |
Bjoern Soergel, Elmar Kriegler, Isabelle Weindl, Sebastian Rauner, Alois Dirnaichner, Constantin Ruhe, Matthias Hofmann, Nico Bauer, Christoph Bertram, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Marian Leimbach, Julia Leininger, Antoine Levesque, Gunnar Luderer, Michaja Pehl, Christopher Wingens, Lavinia Baumstark, Felicitas Beier, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Florian Humpenöder, Patrick von Jeetze, David Klein, Johannes Koch, Robert Pietzcker, Jessica Strefler, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Alexander Popp |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 13 | 7% |
| United States | 12 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Uganda | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 130 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 149 | 83% |
| Scientists | 24 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 538 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 538 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 70 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 87 | 16% |
| Unknown | 230 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 54 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 31 | 6% |
| Engineering | 26 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 124 | 23% |
| Unknown | 253 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2023.
All research outputs
#159,839
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#541
of 4,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,535
of 444,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#14
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 130.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.