↓ Skip to main content

Técnicas de avaliação de gosto e odor em águas de abastecimento: método analítico, análise sensorial e percepção dos consumidores

Overview of attention for article published in Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Técnicas de avaliação de gosto e odor em águas de abastecimento: método analítico, análise sensorial e percepção dos consumidores
Published in
Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, December 2006
DOI 10.1590/s1413-41522006000400009
Authors

Sidney Seckler Ferreira Filho, Rosemeire Alves

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#17,279,309
of 19,519,615 outputs
Outputs from Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental
#38
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,247
of 336,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,519,615 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them