You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Managing LUTS in primary care: Qualitative study of GPs’ and patients’ experiences
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.1043 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Milosevic, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Bethan Pell, Elizabeth Cain, Robyn Hackett, Ffion Murdoch, Haroon Ahmed, A Joy Allen, Alison Bray, Emma Thomas-Jones, Chris Harding, Adrian Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 26 | 67% |
Moldova, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 27 | 69% |
Scientists | 6 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,052,068
of 23,468,283 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#500
of 4,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,396
of 448,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#22
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,468,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.