You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SnIPRE: Selection Inference Using a Poisson Random Effects Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002806 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirsten E. Eilertson, James G. Booth, Carlos D. Bustamante |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 27% |
| Researcher | 34 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2012.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,647
of 9,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,018
of 290,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#120
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.