You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biochemical and molecular features of Chinese patients with glutaric acidemia type 1 detected through newborn screening
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-01964-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yiming Lin, Wenjun Wang, Chunmei Lin, Zhenzhu Zheng, Qingliu Fu, Weilin Peng, Dongmei Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,832
of 2,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,483
of 432,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#53
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.