↓ Skip to main content

When Does Overuse of Antibiotics Become a Tragedy of the Commons?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Does Overuse of Antibiotics Become a Tragedy of the Commons?
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046505
Pubmed ID
Authors

Travis C. Porco, Daozhou Gao, James C. Scott, Eunha Shim, Wayne T. Enanoria, Alison P. Galvani, Thomas M. Lietman

Abstract

Over-prescribing of antibiotics is considered to result in increased morbidity and mortality from drug-resistant organisms. A resulting common wisdom is that it would be better for society if physicians would restrain their prescription of antibiotics. In this view, self-interest and societal interest are at odds, making antibiotic use a classic "tragedy of the commons".

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 8 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 37 26%
Unknown 38 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,167,344
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#27,305
of 202,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,977
of 282,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#546
of 4,770 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,770 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.