You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anatomical Brain Images Alone Can Accurately Diagnose Chronic Neuropsychiatric Illnesses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0050698 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ravi Bansal, Lawrence H. Staib, Andrew F. Laine, Xuejun Hao, Dongrong Xu, Jun Liu, Myrna Weissman, Bradley S. Peterson |
| Abstract |
Diagnoses using imaging-based measures alone offer the hope of improving the accuracy of clinical diagnosis, thereby reducing the costs associated with incorrect treatments. Previous attempts to use brain imaging for diagnosis, however, have had only limited success in diagnosing patients who are independent of the samples used to derive the diagnostic algorithms. We aimed to develop a classification algorithm that can accurately diagnose chronic, well-characterized neuropsychiatric illness in single individuals, given the availability of sufficiently precise delineations of brain regions across several neural systems in anatomical MR images of the brain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 42 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 9% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Denmark | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 121 | 81% |
| Scientists | 20 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 4% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 19% |
| Researcher | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 64 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Engineering | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#247,884
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,592
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,530
of 292,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#59
of 4,832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.