↓ Skip to main content

Philympics 2021: Prophage Predictions Perplex Programs

Overview of attention for article published in F1000 Research, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Philympics 2021: Prophage Predictions Perplex Programs
Published in
F1000 Research, August 2021
DOI 10.12688/f1000research.54449.1
Authors

Michael J. Roach, Katelyn McNair, Sarah K Giles, Laura K Inglis, Evan Pargin, Simon Roux, Przemysław Decewicz, Robert A. Edwards

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,057,416
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from F1000 Research
#672
of 6,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,393
of 442,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from F1000 Research
#19
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.