↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of Phase Transition in the Thalamocortical System during Anesthesia-Induced Loss of Consciousness

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of Phase Transition in the Thalamocortical System during Anesthesia-Induced Loss of Consciousness
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eunjin Hwang, Seunghwan Kim, Kyungreem Han, Jee Hyun Choi

Abstract

The thalamocortical system plays a key role in the breakdown or emergence of consciousness, providing bottom-up information delivery from sensory afferents and integrating top-down intracortical and thalamocortical reciprocal signaling. A fundamental and so far unanswered question for cognitive neuroscience remains whether the thalamocortical switch for consciousness works in a discontinuous manner or not. To unveil the nature of thalamocortical system phase transition in conjunction with consciousness transition, ketamine/xylazine was administered unobtrusively to ten mice under a forced working test with motion tracker, and field potentials in the sensory and motor-related cortex and thalamic nuclei were concomitantly collected. Sensory and motor-related thalamocortical networks were found to behave continuously at anesthesia induction and emergence, as evidenced by a sigmoidal response function with respect to anesthetic concentration. Hyperpolarizing and depolarizing susceptibility diverged, and a non-discrete change of transitional probability occurred at transitional regimes, which are hallmarks of continuous phase transition. The hyperpolarization curve as a function of anesthetic concentration demonstrated a hysteresis loop, with a significantly higher anesthetic level for transition to the down state compared to transition to the up state. Together, our findings concerning the nature of phase transition in the thalamocortical system during consciousness transition further elucidate the underlying basis for the ambiguous borderlines between conscious and unconscious brains. Moreover, our novel analysis method can be applied to systematic and quantitative handling of subjective concepts in cognitive neuroscience.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 4%
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Belarus 1 2%
Unknown 48 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Psychology 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,176,348
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,810
of 193,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,364
of 277,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,931
of 4,765 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,765 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.