You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In Vivo Effects Of Traditional Ayurvedic Formulations in Drosophila melanogaster Model Relate with Therapeutic Applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0037113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vibha Dwivedi, E. M. Anandan, Rajesh S. Mony, T. S. Muraleedharan, M. S. Valiathan, Mousumi Mutsuddi, Subhash C. Lakhotia |
| Abstract |
Ayurveda represents the traditional medicine system of India. Since mechanistic details of therapy in terms of current biology are not available in Ayurvedic literature, modern scientific studies are necessary to understand its major concepts and procedures. It is necessary to examine effects of the whole Ayurvedic formulations rather than their "active" components as is done in most current studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 29% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,877,240
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,238
of 193,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,988
of 163,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#407
of 3,792 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,792 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.