You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of SMN Protein, Transcript, and Copy Number in the Biomarkers for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (BforSMA) Clinical Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0033572 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas O. Crawford, Sergey V. Paushkin, Dione T. Kobayashi, Suzanne J. Forrest, Cynthia L. Joyce, Richard S. Finkel, Petra Kaufmann, Kathryn J. Swoboda, Danilo Tiziano, Rosa Lomastro, Rebecca H. Li, Felicia L. Trachtenberg, Thomas Plasterer, Karen S. Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,599,311
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,599
of 199,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,908
of 164,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,186
of 3,709 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,709 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.