↓ Skip to main content

Transparency of COVID-19 vaccine trials: decisions without data

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,448)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
732 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transparency of COVID-19 vaccine trials: decisions without data
Published in
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, August 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111735
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Tanveer, Anisa Rowhani-Farid, Kyungwan Hong, Tom Jefferson, Peter Doshi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 732 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 23 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 592. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#39,561
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#16
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,426
of 439,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.