You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Comparison of whole-body computed tomography vs selective radiological imaging on outcomes in major trauma patients: a meta-analysis
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, September 2014
Libing Jiang, Yuefeng Ma, Shouyin Jiang, Ligang Ye, Zhongjun Zheng, Yongan Xu, Mao Zhang
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||13||11%|
|Student > Postgraduate||12||10%|
|Student > Master||11||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||82||70%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||2||2%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||<1%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||<1%|
|Physics and Astronomy||1||<1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
of 1,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 238,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.