You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Cameroon Mobile Phone SMS (CAMPS) Trial: A Randomized Trial of Text Messaging versus Usual Care for Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0046909 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Lehana Thabane, Pierre Ongolo-Zogo, Richard T. Lester, Edward J. Mills, Marek Smieja, Lisa Dolovich, Charles Kouanfack |
| Abstract |
Mobile phone technology is a novel way of delivering health care and improving health outcomes. This trial investigates the use of motivational mobile phone text messages (SMS) to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) over six months. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 25% |
| United States | 4 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 398 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 81 | 20% |
| Researcher | 66 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 20% |
| Unknown | 71 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 10% |
| Psychology | 21 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 68 | 16% |
| Unknown | 94 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,572,558
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,403
of 224,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,989
of 288,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#351
of 4,777 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,777 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.