You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disentangling Direct from Indirect Co-Evolution of Residues in Protein Alignments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000633 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lukas Burger, Erik van Nimwegen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 7% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 196 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 31% |
| Researcher | 62 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 120 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 19 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,726,082
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,703
of 9,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,967
of 178,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#19
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.