You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of four channelled videolaryngoscopes to Macintosh laryngoscope for simulated intubation of critically ill patients: the randomized MACMAN2 trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00916-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Decamps, Nicolas Grillot, Aurelie Le Thuaut, Noelle Brule, Corinne Lejus-Bourdeau, Jean Reignier, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Belgium | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 37% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#246,955
of 24,826,104 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#24
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,140
of 392,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,826,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.