↓ Skip to main content

Supervised maintenance programmes following pulmonary rehabilitation compared to usual care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supervised maintenance programmes following pulmonary rehabilitation compared to usual care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013569.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla Malaguti, Simone Dal Corso, Sadia Janjua, Anne E Holland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 23 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Master 13 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 92 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Unspecified 23 11%
Psychology 7 3%
Environmental Science 2 <1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 97 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,422,535
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,053
of 11,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,854
of 427,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.