↓ Skip to main content

Removing barriers to participation in clinical trials, a conceptual framework and retrospective chart review study

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Removing barriers to participation in clinical trials, a conceptual framework and retrospective chart review study
Published in
Trials, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norma F Kanarek, Marty S Kanarek, Dare Olatoye, Michael A Carducci

Abstract

Enrollment in interventional therapeutic clinical trials is a small fraction of all patients who might participate given reasonable access.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Psychology 5 10%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2012.
All research outputs
#1,529,187
of 3,631,967 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#477
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,385
of 276,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#25
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,631,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 55th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.