↓ Skip to main content

The Prognostic Value of BRAF Mutation in Colorectal Cancer and Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Prognostic Value of BRAF Mutation in Colorectal Cancer and Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gholamreza Safaee Ardekani, Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad, Larry Tan, Ardavan Saeedi, Gang Li

Abstract

Mutation of BRAF is a predominant event in cancers with poor prognosis such as melanoma and colorectal cancer. BRAF mutation leads to a constitutive activation of mitogen activated protein kinase pathway which is essential for cell proliferation and tumor progression. Despite tremendous efforts made to target BRAF for cancer treatment, the correlation between BRAF mutation and patient survival is still a matter of controversy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 142 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Researcher 22 15%
Other 18 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 186. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#210,868
of 25,186,033 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,100
of 218,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,011
of 180,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#44
of 4,576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,186,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.