You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical considerations in quality improvement: key questions and a practical guide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open Quality, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001497 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Francis Hunt, Michael Dunn, Guy Harrison, Jill Bailey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 30% |
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| Namibia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 61 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,196,468
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Quality
#41
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,547
of 437,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Quality
#3
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.