↓ Skip to main content

Move-by-Move Dynamics of the Advantage in Chess Matches Reveals Population-Level Learning of the Game

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Move-by-Move Dynamics of the Advantage in Chess Matches Reveals Population-Level Learning of the Game
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haroldo V. Ribeiro, Renio S. Mendes, Ervin K. Lenzi, Marcelo del Castillo-Mussot, Luís A. N. Amaral

Abstract

The complexity of chess matches has attracted broad interest since its invention. This complexity and the availability of large number of recorded matches make chess an ideal model systems for the study of population-level learning of a complex system. We systematically investigate the move-by-move dynamics of the white player's advantage from over seventy thousand high level chess matches spanning over 150 years. We find that the average advantage of the white player is positive and that it has been increasing over time. Currently, the average advantage of the white player is 0.17 pawns but it is exponentially approaching a value of 0.23 pawns with a characteristic time scale of 67 years. We also study the diffusion of the move dependence of the white player's advantage and find that it is non-Gaussian, has long-ranged anti-correlations and that after an initial period with no diffusion it becomes super-diffusive. We find that the duration of the non-diffusive period, corresponding to the opening stage of a match, is increasing in length and exponentially approaching a value of 15.6 moves with a characteristic time scale of 130 years. We interpret these two trends as a resulting from learning of the features of the game. Additionally, we find that the exponent [Formula: see text] characterizing the super-diffusive regime is increasing toward a value of 1.9, close to the ballistic regime. We suggest that this trend is due to the increased broadening of the range of abilities of chess players participating in major tournaments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 6%
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 41 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Professor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 18%
Engineering 5 10%
Computer Science 5 10%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 14 29%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#933,291
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,744
of 193,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,769
of 282,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#295
of 5,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.