↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for providers to promote a patient‐centred approach in clinical consultations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
28 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
676 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1522 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for providers to promote a patient‐centred approach in clinical consultations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003267.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Dwamena, Margaret Holmes‐Rovner, Carolyn M Gaulden, Sarah Jorgenson, Gelareh Sadigh, Alla Sikorskii, Simon Lewin, Robert C Smith, John Coffey, Adesuwa Olomu, Michael Beasley

Abstract

Communication problems in health care may arise as a result of healthcare providers focusing on diseases and their management, rather than people, their lives and their health problems. Patient-centred approaches to care delivery in the patient encounter are increasingly advocated by consumers and clinicians and incorporated into training for healthcare providers. However, the impact of these interventions directly on clinical encounters and indirectly on patient satisfaction, healthcare behaviour and health status has not been adequately evaluated.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,522 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1482 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 228 15%
Researcher 200 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 175 11%
Student > Bachelor 146 10%
Student > Postgraduate 80 5%
Other 332 22%
Unknown 361 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 455 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 226 15%
Psychology 122 8%
Social Sciences 92 6%
Unspecified 25 2%
Other 181 12%
Unknown 421 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#456,894
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#752
of 13,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,956
of 291,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.