↓ Skip to main content

Reduction of [11C](+)3-MPB Binding in Brain of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome with Serum Autoantibody against Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptor

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduction of [11C](+)3-MPB Binding in Brain of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome with Serum Autoantibody against Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptor
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shigeyuki Yamamoto, Yasuomi Ouchi, Daisaku Nakatsuka, Tsuyoshi Tahara, Kei Mizuno, Seiki Tajima, Hirotaka Onoe, Etsuji Yoshikawa, Hideo Tsukada, Masao Iwase, Kouzi Yamaguti, Hirohiko Kuratsune, Yasuyoshi Watanabe

Abstract

Numerous associations between brain-reactive antibodies and neurological or psychiatric symptoms have been proposed. Serum autoantibody against the muscarinic cholinergic receptor (mAChR) was increased in some patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or psychiatric disease. We examined whether serum autoantibody against mAChR affected the central cholinergic system by measuring brain mAChR binding and acetylcholinesterase activity using positron emission tomography (PET) in CFS patients with positive [CFS(+)] and negative [CFS(-)] autoantibodies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Psychology 4 7%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2012.
All research outputs
#5,258,880
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#85,909
of 221,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,145
of 286,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,138
of 4,880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.