You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus bilateral deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson's disease (NSTAPS study): a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Neurology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70264-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent JJ Odekerken, Teus van Laar, Michiel J Staal, Arne Mosch, Carel FE Hoffmann, Peter CG Nijssen, Guus N Beute, Jeroen PP van Vugt, Mathieu WPM Lenders, M Fiorella Contarino, Marieke SJ Mink, Lo J Bour, Pepijn van den Munckhof, Ben A Schmand, Rob J de Haan, P Richard Schuurman, Rob MA de Bie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 635 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 601 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 107 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 11% |
| Other | 53 | 8% |
| Other | 144 | 23% |
| Unknown | 108 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 224 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 109 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 4% |
| Psychology | 27 | 4% |
| Engineering | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 63 | 10% |
| Unknown | 160 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,829,175
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#1,934
of 4,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,809
of 183,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#18
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.