Title |
Trade-Offs in Relative Limb Length among Peruvian Children: Extending the Thrifty Phenotype Hypothesis to Limb Proportions
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0051795 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emma Pomeroy, Jay T. Stock, Sanja Stanojevic, J. Jaime Miranda, Tim J. Cole, Jonathan C. K. Wells |
Abstract |
Both the concept of 'brain-sparing' growth and associations between relative lower limb length, childhood environment and adult disease risk are well established. Furthermore, tibia length is suggested to be particularly plastic under conditions of environmental stress. The mechanisms responsible are uncertain, but three hypotheses may be relevant. The 'thrifty phenotype' assumes that some components of growth are selectively sacrificed to preserve more critical outcomes, like the brain. The 'distal blood flow' hypothesis assumes that blood nutrients decline with distance from the heart, and hence may affect limbs in relation to basic body geometry. Temperature adaptation predicts a gradient of decreased size along the limbs reflecting decreasing tissue temperature/blood flow. We examined these questions by comparing the size of body segments among Peruvian children born and raised in differentially stressful environments. In a cross-sectional sample of children aged 6 months to 14 years (n = 447) we measured head circumference, head-trunk height, total upper and lower limb lengths, and zeugopod (ulna and tibia) and autopod (hand and foot) lengths. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
Canada | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 123 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 26 | 20% |
Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 27 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |