↓ Skip to main content

Manipulative therapies for infantile colic

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
125 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
414 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Manipulative therapies for infantile colic
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004796.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawn Dobson, Peter LBJ Lucassen, Joyce J Miller, Arine M Vlieger, Philip Prescott, George Lewith

Abstract

Infantile colic is a common disorder, affecting around one in six families, and in 2001 was reported to cost the UK National Health Service in excess of £65 million per year (Morris 2001). Although it usually remits by six months of age, there is some evidence of longer-term sequelae for both children and parents.Manipulative therapies, such as chiropractic and osteopathy, have been suggested as interventions to reduce the severity of symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 407 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 17%
Student > Bachelor 54 13%
Researcher 43 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 7%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Other 88 21%
Unknown 104 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 16%
Psychology 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 109 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 268. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#134,395
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#241
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#731
of 286,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.