↓ Skip to main content

Peripheral nerve block anesthesia/analgesia for patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty: recommendations from the International Consensus on Anesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery (ICA…

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 2,555)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
121 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peripheral nerve block anesthesia/analgesia for patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty: recommendations from the International Consensus on Anesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery (ICAROS) group based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, August 2021
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2021-102750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stavros G Memtsoudis, Crispiana Cozowicz, Janis Bekeris, Dace Bekere, Jiabin Liu, Ellen M Soffin, Edward R Mariano, Rebecca L Johnson, George Go, Mary J Hargett, Bradley H Lee, Pamela Wendel, Mark Brouillette, Sang Jo Kim, Lila Baaklini, Douglas S Wetmore, Genewoo Hong, Rie Goto, Bridget Jivanelli, Vassilis Athanassoglou, Eriphili Argyra, Michael John Barrington, Alain Borgeat, Jose De Andres, Kariem El-Boghdadly, Nabil M Elkassabany, Philippe Gautier, Peter Gerner, Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle, Enrique Goytizolo, Zhenggang Guo, Rosemary Hogg, Henrik Kehlet, Paul Kessler, Sandra Kopp, Patricia Lavand'homme, Alan Macfarlane, Catherine MacLean, Carlos Mantilla, Dan McIsaac, Alexander McLawhorn, Joseph M Neal, Michael Parks, Javad Parvizi, Philip Peng, Lukas Pichler, Jashvant Poeran, Lazaros Poultsides, Eric S Schwenk, Brian D Sites, Ottokar Stundner, Eric C Sun, Eugene Viscusi, Effrossyni Gina Votta-Velis, Christopher L Wu, Jacques YaDeau, Nigel E Sharrock

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 23 20%
Other 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 31%
Unspecified 23 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 38 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#536,814
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#40
of 2,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,028
of 425,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.