You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How to reduce your cancer risk: mechanisms and myths
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s18657 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zeina Nahleh, Narinder Singh Bhatti, Meenakshi Mal |
Abstract |
Cancer prevention continues to be a high research priority and the most optimal way to ultimately lower the economic and psychological burden of cancer. Many known risk factors associated with cancer are related to dietary and lifestyle factors and can be avoided. These risk factors include among others, smoking, obesity, alcohol, physical inactivity, and carcinogens in diet. This article reviews the biological mechanisms leading to cancer in association with these factors, highlights important achievable cancer prevention methods, addresses commonly asked questions about lifestyle and cancer, and dispels some of the myths about cancer prevention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Lebanon | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 22% |
Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,011,500
of 24,413,320 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#315
of 1,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,628
of 112,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,413,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.