↓ Skip to main content

Guinea Pig Model for Evaluating the Potential Public Health Risk of Swine and Avian Influenza Viruses

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guinea Pig Model for Evaluating the Potential Public Health Risk of Swine and Avian Influenza Viruses
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yipeng Sun, Yuhai Bi, Juan Pu, Yanxin Hu, Jingjing Wang, Huijie Gao, Linqing Liu, Qi Xu, Yuanyuan Tan, Mengda Liu, Xin Guo, Hanchun Yang, Jinhua Liu

Abstract

The influenza viruses circulating in animals sporadically transmit to humans and pose pandemic threats. Animal models to evaluate the potential public health risk potential of these viruses are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 37%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,095,841
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,192
of 193,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,335
of 179,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#799
of 1,022 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,022 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.