↓ Skip to main content

Bare Bones Pattern Formation: A Core Regulatory Network in Varying Geometries Reproduces Major Features of Vertebrate Limb Development and Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bare Bones Pattern Formation: A Core Regulatory Network in Varying Geometries Reproduces Major Features of Vertebrate Limb Development and Evolution
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010892
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianfeng Zhu, Yong-Tao Zhang, Mark S. Alber, Stuart A. Newman

Abstract

Major unresolved questions regarding vertebrate limb development concern how the numbers of skeletal elements along the proximodistal (P-D) and anteroposterior (A-P) axes are determined and how the shape of a growing limb affects skeletal element formation. There is currently no generally accepted model for these patterning processes, but recent work on cartilage development (chondrogenesis) indicates that precartilage tissue self-organizes into nodular patterns by cell-molecular circuitry with local auto-activating and lateral inhibitory (LALI) properties. This process is played out in the developing limb in the context of a gradient of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) emanating from the apical ectodermal ridge (AER).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Argentina 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Gambia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 129 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Professor 9 6%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 14 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,054,920
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#93,179
of 211,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,663
of 100,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#335
of 703 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 703 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.