You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-021-00201-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Leeman, Catherine Rohweder, Matthew Lee, Alison Brenner, Andrea Dwyer, Linda K. Ko, Meghan C. O’Leary, Grace Ryan, Thuy Vu, Shoba Ramanadhan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 43% |
| Australia | 4 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,182,371
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#62
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,615
of 436,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.